Clicky

Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29
Casio Exilim EX-Z280 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-Z280
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
  • Revealed August 2009
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Announced February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z280 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Sigma. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-Z280 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-Z280 was manufactured 5 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z280 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z280 grades versus the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-Z280 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-Z280

 DP2 Quattro EX-Z280 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014August 2009Fresher by 54 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k115kClearer display (+805k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-Z280 DP2 Quattro 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z280 has got physical measurements of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z280 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z280 compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z280 and DP2 Quattro is 96 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The photograph here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z280 and DP2 Quattro.

All in all, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z280 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give greater detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z280 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z280 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
27
manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
77
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z280 as a Street photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
55
lighter than average in class (133g)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
61
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z280 Sports photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography information
17
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
48
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z280 Travel photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography advice
62
lighter than average in class (133 grams)
flash built-in
pretty wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
53
megapixel count good (20MP)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z280 Landscape photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography info
32
manual focus
pretty wide (26mm)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
59
has manual focus
good sized screen (3 inch)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z280 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
28
pretty wide (26mm)
lighter than average in class (133g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic socket
9
can't record video
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z280 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-Z280Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Sigma
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z280 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-08-31 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-104mm (4.0x) 45mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 115k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.20 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 133g (0.29 lb) 395g (0.87 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-80 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $180 $931