Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm AV200
95 Imaging
32 Features
19 Overall
26
94 Imaging
36 Features
16 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm AV200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Announced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix AV205
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm AV200 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-Z29 and FujiFilm AV200, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and FujiFilm. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and AV200 (14MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and AV200 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z29 was introduced 22 months before the AV200 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm AV200 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z29 matches up vs the AV200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm AV200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & FujiFilm FinePix AV200. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & FujiFilm AV200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the FujiFilm AV200
| EX-Z29 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Casio EX-Z29
| AV200 | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 | March 2009 | Newer by 22 months | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and FujiFilm AV200
| EX-Z29 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm AV200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z29 offers outside measurements of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the FujiFilm AV200 has proportions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z29 and FujiFilm AV200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z29 versus the AV200.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z29 and AV200 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm AV200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z29 and AV200.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z29 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the FujiFilm AV200 will give more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z29 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm AV200 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm AV200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 |
| Also called as | - | FinePix AV205 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-03-03 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 32-96mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.9-5.2 |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 180 images |
| Style of battery | - | AA |
| Battery ID | NP-60 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $79 | $0 |