Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Revealed March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm S200EXR, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and S200EXR (1/1.6") possess different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z29 was manufactured 4 months prior to the S200EXR and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-Z29 matches up vs the S200EXR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 and FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery and FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-Z29 | S200EXR |
|---|
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-Z29
| S200EXR | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-Z29 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2009 |  | July 2009 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z29 has physical measurements of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S200EXR has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm S200EXR in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z29 versus the S200EXR.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z29 and S200EXR is 95 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out specs. The image underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z29 and S200EXR.
All in all, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z29 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the FujiFilm S200EXR will show more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z29 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
| Also called | - | FinePix S205EXR |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-03-03 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 7.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 865 grams (1.91 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-60 | NP-140 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $79 | $500 |