Casio EX-Z29 vs Kodak M320

In this write-up, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z29 versus Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and the M320 (9MP) is very similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.5").

Photography Glossary

The EX-Z29 was unveiled 2 months after the M320 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-Z29 grades vs the M320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Kodak EasyShare M320. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.

If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z29 provides outer dimensions of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-Z29 versus Kodak M320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z29 and the M320.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z29 and M320 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Typically, its hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The image here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z29 and M320.

Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-Z29 to offer more detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively.