Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3
95 Imaging
32 Features
19 Overall
26
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-Z29 and Ricoh CX3, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and CX3 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z29 was manufactured 15 months before the CX3 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-Z29 matches up vs the CX3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Ricoh CX3
| EX-Z29 | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Casio EX-Z29
| CX3 | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 |  | March 2009 | More recent by 15 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Ricoh CX3
| EX-Z29 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z29 has got physical measurements of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z29 and Ricoh CX3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z29 vs the CX3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z29 and CX3 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z29 and CX3.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The EX-Z29 features the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF harder. The older EX-Z29 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-03-03 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 206g (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-60 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $79 | $329 |