Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3
95 Imaging
32 Features
19 Overall
26
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-Z29 and Ricoh CX3, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and CX3 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z29 was manufactured 15 months before the CX3 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-Z29 matches up vs the CX3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Ricoh CX3
| EX-Z29 | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Casio EX-Z29
| CX3 | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 |  | March 2009 | More recent by 15 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Ricoh CX3
| EX-Z29 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z29 has got physical measurements of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z29 and Ricoh CX3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z29 vs the CX3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z29 and CX3 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z29 and CX3.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The EX-Z29 features the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF harder. The older EX-Z29 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-03-03 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 206g (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-60 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $79 | $329 |