Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-50
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27


91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017

Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z29 versus Ricoh WG-50, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and WG-50 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.

The EX-Z29 was revealed 9 years prior to the WG-50 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-Z29 grades against the WG-50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Ricoh WG-50
EX-Z29 | WG-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-Z29
WG-50 | EX-Z29 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | ![]() | March 2009 | More modern by 100 months |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Ricoh WG-50
EX-Z29 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z29 comes with outer dimensions of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z29 versus Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z29 against the WG-50.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z29 and WG-50 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z29 and WG-50.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z29 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Ricoh WG-50 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z29 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-03-03 | 2017-05-24 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-60 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $79 | $280 |