Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung DV300F
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Announced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung DV300F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and DV300F (16MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and DV300F (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z29 was brought out 3 years prior to the DV300F which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung DV300F being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-Z29 grades vs the DV300F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Samsung DV300F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Samsung DV300F
| EX-Z29 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Casio EX-Z29
| DV300F | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | March 2009 | Newer by 34 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung DV300F
| EX-Z29 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z29 comes with exterior measurements of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung DV300F has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung DV300F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z29 against the DV300F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z29 and DV300F is 95 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The image below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z29 and DV300F.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z29 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Samsung DV300F will deliver extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z29 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung DV300F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-03-03 | 2012-01-02 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 133 gr (0.29 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-60 | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SDHC / SD Memory Card | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $79 | $200 |