Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL202
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Revealed March 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also Known as PL50
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL202, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is relatively close but the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and SL202 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z29 was unveiled at a similar time to the SL202 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-Z29 scores vs the SL202 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Samsung SL202
| EX-Z29 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-Z29
| SL202 | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung SL202
| EX-Z29 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2009 |  | February 2009 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z29 offers outside dimensions of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z29 against the SL202.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z29 and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching specifications. The visual here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z29 and SL202.
Plainly, both cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The EX-Z29 comes with the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF more difficult.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-03-03 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-60 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $79 | $140 |