Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210
95 Imaging
32 Features
19 Overall
26
94 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Launched March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Also referred to as PL150
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and the TL210 (12MP) is very similar but the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and TL210 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z29 was manufactured 10 months before the TL210 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z29 scores against the TL210 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Samsung TL210. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Samsung TL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Samsung TL210
| EX-Z29 | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Casio EX-Z29
| TL210 | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | March 2009 | Newer by 10 months |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung TL210
| EX-Z29 | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z29 features outside dimensions of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung TL210 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z29 and the TL210.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z29 and TL210 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The image underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z29 and TL210.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z29 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung TL210 will offer you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z29 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung TL210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung TL210 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL150 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-03-03 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 177g (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-60 | SLB-07B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $79 | $230 |