Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210
95 Imaging
32 Features
19 Overall
26
94 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Launched March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Also referred to as PL150
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and the TL210 (12MP) is very similar but the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and TL210 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z29 was manufactured 10 months before the TL210 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z29 scores against the TL210 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Samsung TL210. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Samsung TL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Samsung TL210
| EX-Z29 | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Casio EX-Z29
| TL210 | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | March 2009 | Newer by 10 months |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung TL210
| EX-Z29 | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z29 features outside dimensions of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung TL210 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z29 and the TL210.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z29 and TL210 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The image underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z29 and TL210.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z29 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung TL210 will offer you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z29 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung TL210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung TL210 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL150 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-03-03 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 177g (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-60 | SLB-07B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $79 | $230 |