Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB210
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Announced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung WB210, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and WB210 (14MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and WB210 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z29 was brought out 3 years before the WB210 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-Z29 grades against the WB210 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 and Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-Z29 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 115k |  | 1k | Sharper display (+114k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-Z29
| WB210 | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | March 2009 | More recent by 28 months |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung WB210
| EX-Z29 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z29 comes with external measurements of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung WB210 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z29 and the WB210.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z29 and WB210 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The graphic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z29 and WB210.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z29 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung WB210 will provide extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos more aggressively. The older EX-Z29 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung WB210 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-03-03 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 1k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 174g (0.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-60 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $79 | $279 |