Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB35F
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Revealed March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB35F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and WB35F (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z29 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WB35F which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-Z29 scores vs the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Samsung WB35F
| EX-Z29 | WB35F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-Z29
| WB35F | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | March 2009 | More modern by 59 months |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung WB35F
| EX-Z29 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z29 offers outside dimensions of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z29 against the WB35F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z29 and WB35F is 95 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The picture underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z29 and WB35F.
To sum up, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z29 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung WB35F will deliver greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z29 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-03-03 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-60 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SDHC / SD Memory Card | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $79 | $130 |