Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB750
95 Imaging
32 Features
19 Overall
26
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Revealed September 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB750, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and WB750 (13MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and WB750 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z29 was announced 3 years prior to the WB750 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-Z29 grades vs the WB750 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 and Samsung WB750. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Samsung WB750
| EX-Z29 | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Casio EX-Z29
| WB750 | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2011 |  | March 2009 | Newer by 30 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung WB750
| EX-Z29 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z29 features external dimensions of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB750 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z29 against the WB750.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z29 and WB750 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The image underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z29 and WB750.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z29 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung WB750 will show greater detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z29 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung WB750 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-03-03 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 115k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-60 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $79 | $339 |