Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB800F
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27


92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Introduced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013

Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Casio EX-Z29 versus Samsung WB800F, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and WB800F (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.

The EX-Z29 was brought out 4 years before the WB800F and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-Z29 grades versus the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 and Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Samsung WB800F
EX-Z29 | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-Z29
WB800F | EX-Z29 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | March 2009 | Fresher by 46 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper display (+345k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung WB800F
EX-Z29 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z29 has physical measurements of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z29 versus Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z29 against the WB800F.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z29 and WB800F is 95 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing specs. The visual here may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z29 and WB800F.
All in all, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z29 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung WB800F will show greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The older EX-Z29 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung WB800F |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-03-03 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 115k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-60 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $79 | $300 |