Casio EX-Z29 vs Sony TX200V
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-Z29 versus Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Casio and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and TX200V (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z29 was launched 3 years before the TX200V which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-Z29 grades against the TX200V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Sony TX200V
EX-Z29 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Casio EX-Z29
TX200V | EX-Z29 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | March 2009 | Newer by 35 months | |
Screen size | 3.3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 115k | Clearer screen (+1115k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Sony TX200V
EX-Z29 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z29 features external measurements of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z29 versus Sony TX200V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z29 compared to the TX200V.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z29 and TX200V is 95 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The image underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z29 and TX200V.
Plainly, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z29 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony TX200V will result in more detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z29 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z29 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-03-03 | 2012-01-30 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3.3 inch |
Screen resolution | 115k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) | 129 grams (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-60 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $79 | $500 |