Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33/Casio-EX-Z33-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare C140 front Kodak EasyShare C140 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-C140/Kodak-C140-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and C140 (8MP) and the EX-Z33 (1/2.3") and C140 (1/2.5") come with different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z33 was announced 8 months after the C140 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-Z33 scores versus the C140 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Kodak EasyShare C140. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Kodak C140
EX-Z33 | C140 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2009 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 8 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Casio EX-Z33
C140 | EX-Z33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Kodak C140
EX-Z33 | C140 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z33 comes with outer dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Kodak C140 has dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z33 vs the C140.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 size comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-C140-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z33 and C140 is 97 and 94 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-C140-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z33 and C140.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z33 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Casio EX-Z33 will deliver greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The younger EX-Z33 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-C140-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-C140-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak C140 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-08-31 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 8 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3264 x 2448 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.7-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 13cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 106 grams (0.23 lb) | 160 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-82 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $120 | $80 |