Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z33 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and Easyshare M5370 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z33 was unveiled 24 months earlier than the Easyshare M5370 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z33 grades versus the Easyshare M5370 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Kodak Easyshare M5370. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| EX-Z33 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Casio EX-Z33
| Easyshare M5370 | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Kodak Easyshare M5370
| EX-Z33 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z33 offers outer dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z33 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z33 against the Easyshare M5370.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z33 and Easyshare M5370 is 97 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The photograph here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z33 and Easyshare M5370.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to deliver more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z33 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-08-31 | 2011-09-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-1, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 106g (0.23 pounds) | 150g (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $120 | $160 |