Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus SH-3
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-2
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-Z33 versus Olympus SH-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and SH-3 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z33 was released 7 years earlier than the SH-3 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z33 matches up against the SH-3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Olympus SH-3
EX-Z33 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Casio EX-Z33
SH-3 | EX-Z33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | August 2009 | More recent by 78 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus SH-3
EX-Z33 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z33 comes with outer dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z33 versus Olympus SH-3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z33 against the SH-3.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z33 and SH-3 is 97 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z33 and SH-3.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-08-31 | 2016-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.5fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.80 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 106 grams (0.23 pounds) | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-82 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $120 | $579 |