Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is pretty well matched and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z33 was introduced 3 years earlier than the TG-1 iHS and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z33 matches up vs the TG-1 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| EX-Z33 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Casio EX-Z33
| TG-1 iHS | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 32 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| EX-Z33 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z33 has got exterior dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has proportions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-Z33 compared to the TG-1 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and TG-1 iHS is 97 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The graphic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z33 and TG-1 iHS.
Plainly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus TG-1 iHS to give more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-08-31 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 106 grams (0.23 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-82 | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $120 | $399 |