Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very similar but the EX-Z33 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z33 was launched 4 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-Z33 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
EX-Z33 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-Z33
XZ-2 iHS | EX-Z33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | August 2009 | More modern by 40 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
EX-Z33 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z33 offers exterior measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z33 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and XZ-2 iHS is 97 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The image here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z33 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z33 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z33 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-08-31 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.80 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 106 gr (0.23 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-82 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $120 | $450 |