Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
97 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very similar but the EX-Z33 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z33 was launched 4 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-Z33 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-Z33 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-Z33
| XZ-2 iHS | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 | August 2009 | More modern by 40 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-Z33 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z33 offers exterior measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z33 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and XZ-2 iHS is 97 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The image here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z33 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z33 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z33 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-08-31 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 106 gr (0.23 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-82 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $120 | $450 |