Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very similar but the EX-Z33 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z33 was launched 4 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-Z33 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-Z33 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-Z33
| XZ-2 iHS | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 | August 2009 | More modern by 40 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-Z33 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z33 offers exterior measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z33 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and XZ-2 iHS is 97 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The image here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z33 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z33 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z33 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-08-31 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 106 gr (0.23 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-82 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $120 | $450 |