Clicky

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Casio EX-Z33
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
  • Introduced August 2009
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Revealed April 2013
  • Successor is Ricoh GR II
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z33 versus Ricoh GR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and GR (16MP) and the EX-Z33 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-Z33 was released 4 years prior to the GR and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z33 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z33 scores vs the GR for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Ricoh GR

 EX-Z33 GR 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-Z33

 GR EX-Z33 
RevealedApril 2013August 2009Fresher by 44 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1230k230kSharper display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh GR

 EX-Z33 GR 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z33 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-Z33 versus Ricoh GR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z33 vs the GR.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and GR is 97 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z33 and GR.

As you have seen, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z33 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Ricoh GR will show greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR Portrait photography highlights
26
manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
low resolution (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
74
focusing manually
high flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z33
Street photography with Ricoh GR
55
lighter than average (106 grams)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
74
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than others in class (245 grams)
great high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-Z33
Sports photography with Ricoh GR
16
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
45
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Travel photography details
Ricoh GR Travel photography details
56
lighter than average (106g)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
71
lighter than others in class (245 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GR Landscape photography features
27
manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
61
focusing manually
decent sized screen (3 inches)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GR Vlogging highlights
25
lighter than average (106g)
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic support
30
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (245 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
no microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh GR
 Casio Exilim EX-Z33Ricoh GR
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z33 Ricoh GR
Type Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-08-31 2013-04-17
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.8
Macro focusing range 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dots 1,230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 300 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 2.80 m 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 106 grams (0.23 lb) 245 grams (0.54 lb)
Dimensions 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 78
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 972
Other
Battery life - 290 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-82 DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $120 $971