Clicky

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Casio EX-Z33
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
  • Announced August 2009
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Released September 2011
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Below is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-Z33 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The EX-Z33 was unveiled 24 months earlier than the GR Digital IV making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-Z33 scores vs the GR Digital IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 EX-Z33 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-Z33

 GR Digital IV EX-Z33 
ReleasedSeptember 2011August 2009More recent by 24 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1230k230kCrisper display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 EX-Z33 GR Digital IV 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z33 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z33 and the GR Digital IV.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z33 and GR Digital IV is 97 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by going through specifications. The graphic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z33 and GR Digital IV.

To sum up, the 2 cameras feature the identical megapixels but different sensor measurements. The EX-Z33 provides the smaller sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher. The older EX-Z33 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography info
26
manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
41
you can focus manually
saves RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z33
Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
55
lighter than competition (106 grams)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Sports photography details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography details
16
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery (390 shots)
can't change focal length (28mm)
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Travel photography camera
56
lighter than competition (106 grams)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
67
good battery (390 shots)
has built in flash
good max aperture (f1.9)
MP count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Landscape photography info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography info
27
manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.5")
no manual mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
53
you can focus manually
good max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
good battery (390 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Vlogging advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging advice
25
lighter than competition (106 grams)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
29
good max aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Casio Exilim EX-Z33Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Make Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z33 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-08-31 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 28mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/1.9
Macro focusing range 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 2.80 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 106g (0.23 pounds) 190g (0.42 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 photographs
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-82 DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $120 $599