Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-Z33 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z33 was launched 2 months before the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z33 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-Z33 matches up vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-Z33 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-Z33
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-Z33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-Z33 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2009 | November 2009 | Similar generation | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z33 has physical dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z33 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 97 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The pic underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z33 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z33 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-08-31 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.80 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 106g (0.23 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $120 | $566 |