Clicky

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Casio EX-Z33
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
  • Launched August 2009
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Launched March 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is pretty similar but the EX-Z33 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") have totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-Z33 was launched 6 months earlier than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z33 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-Z33 matches up versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

          

          

            
 EX-Z33 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-Z33

          

          

            
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC EX-Z33 
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

          

          

            
 EX-Z33 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
LaunchedAugust 2009March 2010Similar age
Manual focus  More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  No selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither features Touch screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z33 enjoys outside dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z33 compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z33 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 97 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Sometimes, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z33 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The EX-Z33 features the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF more difficult.

            Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z33
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
26
 has manual focus
 no manual mode
 cannot use external flash
 low resolution (10MP)
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
36
 focusing manually
 saves RAW files
 no liveview
 low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Street Comparison
Casio EX-Z33 Street photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography info
55
 lighter than others (106g)
 screen is fixed
 no image stabilization
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW files
 lighter than others in class (355g)
 no moving screen
 sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
 Casio EX-Z33 as a Sports photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Sports photography camera
16
 lack of shutter priority mode
 no image stabilization
 low resolution (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect auto focus
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview
 low frames per second (2.0 frames/s)
 low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/1.7")
 doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-Z33
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
56
 lighter than others (106 grams)
 built-in flash
 lack of Timelapse function
 low resolution (10 megapixels)
 doesn't offer selfie friendly display
 wide angle not the best (36mm)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
60
 lighter than others in class (355 grams)
 flash built-in
 rather wide (24mm)
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
 Casio EX-Z33 as a Landscape photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Landscape photography camera
27
 has manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not the best (36mm)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
 screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
 no manual mode
 no image stabilization
 low resolution (10MP)
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
 lack of Timelapse function
47
 focusing manually
 rather wide (24mm)
 pretty good screen size (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW files
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 sensor size is small (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-Z33
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
25
 lighter than others (106 grams)
 wide angle not the best (36mm)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
 doesn't offer selfie friendly display
 no image stabilization
 video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
 lack of external microphone socket
28
 rather wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than others in class (355 grams)
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
 doesn't have microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
        
                
        

          

            
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Casio Exilim EX-Z33Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Brand Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z33 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2009-08-31 2010-03-18
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Touch to focus    
Continuous AF    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
AF multi area    
AF live view    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus range 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 180 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash range 2.80 m 4.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 106 gr (0.23 lb) 355 gr (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 shots
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-82 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $120 $349