Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33/Casio-EX-Z33-front.jpg)
![Ricoh PX front Ricoh PX front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-PX/Ricoh-PX-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-Z33 versus Ricoh PX, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and PX (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z33 was brought out 23 months before the PX making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z33 grades against the PX in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Ricoh PX. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Ricoh PX
EX-Z33 | PX |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Casio EX-Z33
PX | EX-Z33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | ![]() | August 2009 | More recent by 23 months |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh PX
EX-Z33 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z33 provides outer dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Ricoh PX has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z33 versus Ricoh PX in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z33 against the PX.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX size comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Ricoh-PX-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z33 and PX is 97 and 95 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Ricoh-PX-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing technical specs. The visual below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z33 and PX.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh PX to render more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Ricoh-PX-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Ricoh-PX-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Ricoh PX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Ricoh PX |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-08-31 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3072 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.9-5.4 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.80 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 106 grams (0.23 lbs) | 156 grams (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-82 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $120 | $329 |