Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33/Casio-EX-Z33-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-30 front Ricoh WG-30 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-30/Ricoh-WG-30-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh WG-30, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z33 was announced 6 years prior to the WG-30 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-Z33 matches up against the WG-30 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Ricoh WG-30. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Ricoh WG-30
EX-Z33 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio EX-Z33
WG-30 | EX-Z33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2014 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 62 months |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh WG-30
EX-Z33 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z33 provides external dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh WG-30 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z33 compared to the WG-30.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Ricoh-WG-30-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z33 and WG-30 is 97 and 91 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Ricoh-WG-30-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z33 and WG-30.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-30 to render more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z33 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Ricoh-WG-30-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Ricoh-WG-30-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-08-31 | 2014-10-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 106 gr (0.23 pounds) | 192 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-82 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $120 | $428 |