Clicky

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung HZ10W

Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front
 
Samsung HZ10W front
Portability
90
Imaging
33
Features
27
Overall
30

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs

Casio EX-Z33
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
  • Announced August 2009
Samsung HZ10W
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Other Name is WB500
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview

Lets look closer at the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung HZ10W, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the HZ10W (10MP) is fairly comparable and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-Z33 was released 4 months later than the HZ10W and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-Z33 grades versus the HZ10W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung HZ10W

 EX-Z33 HZ10W 

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Casio EX-Z33

 HZ10W EX-Z33 
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung HZ10W

 EX-Z33 HZ10W 
LaunchedAugust 2009May 2009Same age
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z33 offers outside measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ10W has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung HZ10W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z33 versus the HZ10W.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung HZ10W size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and HZ10W is 97 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung HZ10W top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The visual here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z33 and HZ10W.

Plainly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution and you can expect comparable quality of files though you really should consider the age of the cameras into account.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung HZ10W sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ10W as a Portrait photography camera
26
manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
31
has manual focus
comes with face detect focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Street photography highlights
Samsung HZ10W Street photography highlights
55
lighter than competition (106 grams)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
52
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competitors (249 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Sports photography info
Samsung HZ10W Sports photography info
16
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung HZ10W as a Travel photography camera
56
lighter than competition (106g)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
54
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors (249 grams)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z33
Landscape photography with Samsung HZ10W
27
manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Time Lapse function
35
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Vlogging advice
Samsung HZ10W Vlogging advice
25
lighter than competition (106 grams)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic socket
28
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic jack
heavier than competitors (249g)
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung HZ10W
 Casio Exilim EX-Z33Samsung HZ10W
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z33 Samsung HZ10W
Also referred to as - WB500
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-08-31 2009-05-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2432
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.3-5.8
Macro focus range 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 2.80 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 106 gr (0.23 lbs) 249 gr (0.55 lbs)
Dimensions 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-82 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $120 $300