Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL320
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Also Known as WB1000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z33 was launched 7 months later than the TL320 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z33 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-Z33 scores against the TL320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 and Samsung TL320. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung TL320
| EX-Z33 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2009 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Casio EX-Z33
| TL320 | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung TL320
| EX-Z33 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z33 has got physical dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z33 versus the TL320.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and TL320 is 97 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z33 and TL320.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung TL320 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The younger EX-Z33 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also called | - | WB1000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-08-31 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 106 grams (0.23 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $120 | $380 |