Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB210
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB210, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and WB210 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z33 was launched 22 months earlier than the WB210 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z33 matches up versus the WB210 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Samsung WB210. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-Z33 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Crisper screen (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-Z33
| WB210 | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 22 months |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung WB210
| EX-Z33 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z33 features physical dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB210 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z33 and the WB210.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z33 and WB210 is 97 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The image underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z33 and WB210.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Samsung WB210 to produce more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z33 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung WB210 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-08-31 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 106 grams (0.23 lbs) | 174 grams (0.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $120 | $279 |