Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8baba/8baba5e50d5e0c872fbcd5caef956ef80489badf" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung WB35F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The EX-Z33 was released 5 years prior to the WB35F and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z33 grades vs the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 and Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung WB35F
EX-Z33 | WB35F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-Z33
WB35F | EX-Z33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2009 | Fresher by 53 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung WB35F
EX-Z33 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z33 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z33 vs the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/414eb/414eb52cfb3ec89e76eadf3b1acee62fb7b57231" alt="Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z33 and WB35F is 97 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92b56/92b562fb5a2d9b4e42765a13b80bc7f42b83eee4" alt="Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The graphic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z33 and WB35F.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB35F to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f356/5f3561e72bca9cc9805bbd467d7bf43ca242227e" alt="Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59167/59167c0a37ea8aa4c184b943cd4e8a5665baace8" alt="Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung WB35F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-08-31 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 106g (0.23 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-82 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $120 | $130 |