Clicky

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Casio EX-Z33
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
  • Introduced August 2009
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung WB35F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-Z33 was released 5 years prior to the WB35F and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z33 grades vs the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung WB35F

 EX-Z33 WB35F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-Z33

 WB35F EX-Z33 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014August 2009Fresher by 53 months
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung WB35F

 EX-Z33 WB35F 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z33 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z33 vs the WB35F.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z33 and WB35F is 97 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The graphic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z33 and WB35F.

Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB35F to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Portrait photography info
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography info
26
focusing manually
no manual mode
can't use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
37
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Street photography information
Samsung WB35F Street photography information
55
lighter than competition (106g)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-Z33
Sports photography with Samsung WB35F
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Travel photography info
Samsung WB35F Travel photography info
56
lighter than competition (106 grams)
has built in flash
no Time Lapse recording
MP count low (10MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
70
lighter than competition (194g)
megapixel count good (16MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Landscape photography camera
27
focusing manually
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
43
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Vlogging details
Samsung WB35F Vlogging details
25
lighter than competition (106g)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic support
31
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung WB35F
 Casio Exilim EX-Z33Samsung WB35F
General Information
Brand Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z33 Samsung WB35F
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-08-31 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 2.80 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 106g (0.23 lb) 194g (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-82 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $120 $130