Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung WB50F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z33 was manufactured 5 years before the WB50F which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z33 grades against the WB50F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 and Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-Z33 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-Z33
| WB50F | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | August 2009 | More modern by 53 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-Z33 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z33 features exterior measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung WB50F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z33 vs the WB50F.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and WB50F is 97 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The image below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z33 and WB50F.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung WB50F to give you extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z33 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-08-31 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 106g (0.23 lb) | 207g (0.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $120 | $180 |