Clicky

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Casio EX-Z33
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
  • Introduced August 2009
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Launched January 2014
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Following is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung WB50F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-Z33 was manufactured 5 years before the WB50F which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z33 grades against the WB50F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung WB50F

 EX-Z33 WB50F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-Z33

 WB50F EX-Z33 
LaunchedJanuary 2014August 2009More modern by 53 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung WB50F

 EX-Z33 WB50F 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z33 features exterior measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung WB50F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z33 vs the WB50F.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and WB50F is 97 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The image below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z33 and WB50F.

As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung WB50F to give you extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z33 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Portrait photography camera
26
focusing manually
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
37
has manual focus
decent MP (16MP)
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Street photography advice
Samsung WB50F Street photography advice
55
lighter than competition in class (106 grams)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (207 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Sports photography info
Samsung WB50F Sports photography info
16
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Travel photography details
Samsung WB50F Travel photography details
56
lighter than competition in class (106 grams)
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
MP count low (10MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
69
lighter than competition (207 grams)
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (288mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB50F Landscape photography details
27
focusing manually
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Timelapse mode
47
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-Z33
Vlogging with Samsung WB50F
25
lighter than competition in class (106g)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
no microphone jack
30
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (207g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung WB50F
 Casio Exilim EX-Z33Samsung WB50F
General Information
Brand Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z33 Samsung WB50F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-08-31 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing range 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds -
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 2.80 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 106g (0.23 lb) 207g (0.46 lb)
Physical dimensions 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-82 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $120 $180