Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony H200
97 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
67 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony H200 Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Casio EX-Z33 and Sony H200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and H200 (20MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z33 was manufactured 4 years prior to the H200 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z33 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-Z33 grades versus the H200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony H200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Sony H200
| EX-Z33 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Casio EX-Z33
| H200 | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | August 2009 | More recent by 40 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Sony H200
| EX-Z33 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z33 enjoys external dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has measurements of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z33 and Sony H200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z33 and the H200.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and H200 is 97 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The visual underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z33 and H200.
Clearly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Sony H200 to give you extra detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-08-31 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 106 grams (0.23 pounds) | 530 grams (1.17 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Type of battery | - | AA |
| Battery ID | NP-82 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $120 | $250 |