Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR10
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Introduced September 2010
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Casio EX-Z35 and Casio EX-ZR10, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Casio. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the EX-ZR10 (12MP) is pretty close and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z35 was revealed 7 months prior to the EX-ZR10 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the EX-ZR10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR10. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio EX-ZR10
EX-Z35 | EX-ZR10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Casio EX-Z35
EX-ZR10 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2010 | February 2010 | More modern by 7 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Casio EX-ZR10
EX-Z35 | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 has got external measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZR10 has proportions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z35 and Casio EX-ZR10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z35 and the EX-ZR10.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and EX-ZR10 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing specifications. The pic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and EX-ZR10.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of images although you really should factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR10 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2010-09-20 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Exilim Engine HS |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124g (0.27 lbs) | 176g (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-82 | NP-110 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $99 | $190 |