Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR400
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26


92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013

Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Casio EX-Z35 and Casio EX-ZR400, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Casio. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and EX-ZR400 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-Z35 was released 3 years prior to the EX-ZR400 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the EX-ZR400 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Casio Exilim EX-ZR400. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio EX-ZR400
EX-Z35 | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Casio EX-Z35
EX-ZR400 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 35 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Casio EX-ZR400
EX-Z35 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 has physical dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR400 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z35 and Casio EX-ZR400 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the EX-ZR400.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and EX-ZR400 is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and EX-ZR400.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR400 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Casio |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2013-01-29 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Exilim Engine HS |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 15 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 30.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-82 | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $99 | $0 |