Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR800
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Casio EX-ZR800, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Casio. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and EX-ZR800 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z35 was revealed 4 years earlier than the EX-ZR800 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-Z35 scores vs the EX-ZR800 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Casio Exilim EX-ZR800. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| EX-Z35 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Casio EX-Z35
| EX-ZR800 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2013 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 42 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Casio EX-ZR800
| EX-Z35 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 offers outer measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR800 has specifications of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Casio EX-ZR800 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z35 against the EX-ZR800.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and EX-ZR800 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The visual here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and EX-ZR800.
Plainly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to resolve greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2013-08-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 222 gr (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-82 | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $99 | $429 |