Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35/Casio-EX-Z35-front.jpg)
![Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 front Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS15/Casio-EX-ZS15-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
37 Features
15 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 154g - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced July 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15, both Ultracompact cameras and both are manufactured by Casio. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the EX-ZS15 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z35 was announced 17 months prior to the EX-ZS15 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-Z35 scores against the EX-ZS15 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Casio Exilim EX-ZS15. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Casio EX-ZS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio EX-ZS15
EX-Z35 | EX-ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen sizing | 2.5" | ![]() | " | Bigger screen (+2.5") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS15 over the Casio EX-Z35
EX-ZS15 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 17 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Casio EX-ZS15
EX-Z35 | EX-ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 has exterior dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-ZS15 has specifications of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z35 and the EX-ZS15.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 size comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS15-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and EX-ZS15 is 96 and 95 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS15-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing specs. The photograph below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and EX-ZS15.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZS15 to show greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS15-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS15-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZS15 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Casio |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2011-07-18 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | - |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | - |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 0k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 154 gr (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-82 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $99 | $248 |