Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S8200
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
61 Imaging
39 Features
42 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S8200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S8200 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S8200, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z35 was revealed 3 years prior to the Fujifilm S8200 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-Z35 grades against the Fujifilm S8200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S8200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Fujifilm FinePix S8200. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Fujifilm S8200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Fujifilm S8200
| EX-Z35 | Fujifilm S8200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Casio EX-Z35
| Fujifilm S8200 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | February 2010 | More recent by 35 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Fujifilm S8200
| EX-Z35 | Fujifilm S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S8200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 has exterior dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Fujifilm S8200 has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S8200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z35 vs the Fujifilm S8200.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and Fujifilm S8200 is 96 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S8200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and Fujifilm S8200.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Fujifilm S8200 to render extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S8200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S8200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-960mm (40.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 0cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dot |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1700 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 670 gr (1.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $99 | $450 |