Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S9200
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview
Lets look closer at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S9200, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z35 was announced 4 years before the Fujifilm S9200 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z35 matches up against the Fujifilm S9200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S9200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Fujifilm FinePix S9200. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Fujifilm S9200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Fujifilm S9200
| EX-Z35 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Casio EX-Z35
| Fujifilm S9200 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 47 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Fujifilm S9200
| EX-Z35 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 features external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Fujifilm S9200 has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S9200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z35 and the Fujifilm S9200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and Fujifilm S9200 is 96 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The pic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and Fujifilm S9200.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Fujifilm S9200 to offer you more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2014-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 pounds) | 670 grams (1.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 photos |
| Type of battery | - | AA |
| Battery ID | NP-82 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $99 | $300 |