Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak Touch

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
34
Overall
34

Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak Touch Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Released February 2010
Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak Touch Overview

Here, we are matching up the Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak Touch, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the Touch (14MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and Touch (1/3") have totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-Z35 was manufactured 10 months before the Touch and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the Touch in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

				

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Kodak Touch

 EX-Z35 Touch 
Focus manually More precise focusing

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Casio EX-Z35

 Touch EX-Z35 
ReleasedJanuary 2011February 2010More modern by 10 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Kodak Touch

 EX-Z35 Touch 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with outer measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Kodak Touch has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak Touch in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z35 against the Touch.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak Touch size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and Touch is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out specifications. The pic below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and Touch.

To sum up, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Kodak Touch will produce more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z35
Portrait photography with Kodak Touch
27
manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
32
resolution is good (14MP)
features face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Street photography camera
Kodak Touch as a Street photography camera
48
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
47
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (150 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-Z35
Sports photography with Kodak Touch
17
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
27
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak Touch as a Travel photography camera
52
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
low MP (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
67
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (150g)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Landscape photography info
Kodak Touch Landscape photography info
28
manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.5")
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
41
decently wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-Z35
Vlogging with Kodak Touch
22
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have microphone support
31
decently wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
touchscreen functionality
features face detect focusing
doesn't have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (150g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak Touch Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Kodak Touch
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Kodak EasyShare Touch
General Information
Brand Name Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Kodak EasyShare Touch
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2010-02-21 2011-01-04
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 4.8 x 3.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 17.3mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.6 -
Macro focusing range 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 7.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1600 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 3.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 124 gr (0.27 lbs) 150 gr (0.33 lbs)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-82 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $99 $100