Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S220
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
97 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2000
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
- Announced February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S220 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S220, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Nikon. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the S220 (10MP) is pretty close and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z35 was released 13 months after the S220 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-Z35 matches up against the S220 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S220 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Nikon Coolpix S220. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Nikon S220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Nikon S220
| EX-Z35 | S220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2010 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Casio EX-Z35
| S220 | EX-Z35 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Nikon S220
| EX-Z35 | S220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.5" |  | 2.5" | Identical screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S220 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 features outside measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Nikon S220 has sizing of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z35 against the S220.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and S220 is 96 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S220 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specifications. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and S220.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-Z35 to render greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-Z35 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S220 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S220 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Nikon Coolpix S220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Nikon Coolpix S220 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2009-02-03 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 2000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 lbs) | 100g (0.22 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | EN-EL10 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (3 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $99 | $56 |