Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S3000

On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S3000, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and Nikon. The resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the S3000 (12MP) is very close and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-Z35 was introduced around the same time to the S3000 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-Z35 scores against the S3000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Nikon Coolpix S3000. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Nikon S3000 Gallery.

In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 has external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Nikon S3000 has dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S3000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z35 against the S3000.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and S3000 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Sometimes, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and S3000.

Clearly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of files but you should take the launch date of the cameras into account.