Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S8200
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
91 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S8200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S8200 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S8200, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Nikon. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and S8200 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI LegislationThe EX-Z35 was manufactured 18 months before the S8200 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Nikon S8200 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z35 matches up versus the S8200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S8200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Nikon Coolpix S8200. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Nikon S8200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Nikon S8200
EX-Z35 | S8200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Casio EX-Z35
S8200 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | February 2010 | Newer by 18 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 961k | 230k | Sharper screen (+731k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Nikon S8200
EX-Z35 | S8200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S8200 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 offers outside dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Nikon S8200 has proportions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S8200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z35 against the S8200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and S8200 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S8200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and S8200.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Nikon S8200 to give more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S8200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S8200 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Nikon Coolpix S8200 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2011-08-24 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-350mm (14.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 961 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 213 grams (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-82 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $99 | $329 |