Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z35 was unveiled 6 years prior to the TG-870 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z35 matches up vs the TG-870 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Olympus TG-870
| EX-Z35 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Casio EX-Z35
| TG-870 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2016 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 71 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Olympus TG-870
| EX-Z35 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 provides exterior measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has proportions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 versus Olympus TG-870 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z35 against the TG-870.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and TG-870 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and TG-870.
As you can see, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-870 to provide more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2016-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 pounds) | 221g (0.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-82 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $99 | $280 |
