Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35/Casio-EX-Z35-front.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-870/Olympus-TG-870-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z35 was unveiled 6 years prior to the TG-870 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z35 matches up vs the TG-870 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Olympus TG-870
EX-Z35 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Casio EX-Z35
TG-870 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 71 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Olympus TG-870
EX-Z35 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 provides exterior measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has proportions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 versus Olympus TG-870 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z35 against the TG-870.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-870-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and TG-870 is 96 and 91 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-870-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and TG-870.
As you can see, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-870 to provide more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-870-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-870-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2016-01-06 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124g (0.27 pounds) | 221g (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-82 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $99 | $280 |