Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35/Casio-EX-Z35-front.jpg)
![Olympus VG-110 front Olympus VG-110 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VG-110/Olympus-VG-110-front.jpg)
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-Z35 and Olympus VG-110, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is pretty close and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z35 was announced 11 months before the VG-110 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-Z35 matches up against the VG-110 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Olympus VG-110. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Olympus VG-110
EX-Z35 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Casio EX-Z35
VG-110 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 11 months |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Olympus VG-110
EX-Z35 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 features outside dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Olympus VG-110 has proportions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z35 and Olympus VG-110 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the VG-110.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Olympus-VG-110-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and VG-110 is 96 and 97 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Olympus-VG-110-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through specifications. The visual underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and VG-110.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution and you should expect comparable quality of pictures but you should factor the release date of the cameras into account. The older EX-Z35 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Olympus-VG-110-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Olympus-VG-110-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Olympus VG-110 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 105 grams (0.23 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 170 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-82 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $99 | $150 |