Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX1
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX1, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-Z35 was revealed 13 months later than the CX1 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-Z35 scores vs the CX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Ricoh CX1. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh CX1
| EX-Z35 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2010 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Casio EX-Z35
| CX1 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh CX1
| EX-Z35 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 has outer dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the CX1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and CX1 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading through specifications. The graphic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and CX1.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-Z35 to resolve greater detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer EX-Z35 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-02-21 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 180 grams (0.40 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $99 | $299 |
