Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX3
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh CX3, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z35 was introduced 3 months before the CX3 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-Z35 scores vs the CX3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Ricoh CX3. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh CX3
| EX-Z35 | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Casio EX-Z35
| CX3 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh CX3
| EX-Z35 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2010 |  | June 2010 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 features outside measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh CX3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the CX3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and CX3 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and CX3.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Casio EX-Z35 to give extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 206 gr (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $99 | $329 |