Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX5
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh CX5, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the CX5 (10MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z35 was unveiled 17 months earlier than the CX5 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-Z35 grades vs the CX5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Ricoh CX5. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh CX5
| EX-Z35 | CX5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Casio EX-Z35
| CX5 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 17 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh CX5
| EX-Z35 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 has got external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh CX5 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh CX5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the CX5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and CX5 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and CX5.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-Z35 to give you extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh CX5 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-02-21 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 lbs) | 205g (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $99 | $399 |