Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Renewed by Ricoh GR II
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh GR, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z35 was announced 4 years before the GR and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-Z35 matches up vs the GR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Ricoh GR. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh GR
| EX-Z35 | GR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-Z35
| GR | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2013 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 38 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR
| EX-Z35 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 provides outer dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh GR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the GR.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and GR is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through technical specs. The photograph below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and GR.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z35 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GR will provide you with extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GR |
| Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2013-04-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 300s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-82 | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $99 | $971 |