Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26


92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh GR Digital III, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor sizing.

The EX-Z35 was announced 7 months later than the GR Digital III and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z35 scores against the GR Digital III with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-Z35 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Casio EX-Z35
GR Digital III | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-Z35 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with outer dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the GR Digital III.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and GR Digital III is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing specs. The visual below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and GR Digital III.
All in all, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z35 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Casio EX-Z35 will provide more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The younger EX-Z35 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 208 gr (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $99 | $399 |