Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Revealed February 2010
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Here is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh GR Digital III, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-Z35 was announced 7 months later than the GR Digital III and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z35 scores against the GR Digital III with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

				

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 EX-Z35 GR Digital III 
RevealedFebruary 2010July 2009Fresher by 7 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Casio EX-Z35

 GR Digital III EX-Z35 
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 EX-Z35 GR Digital III 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with outer dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the GR Digital III.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and GR Digital III is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing specs. The visual below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and GR Digital III.

All in all, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z35 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Casio EX-Z35 will provide more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The younger EX-Z35 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Portrait photography details
Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography details
27
manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
40
focusing manually
saves RAW formats
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Street photography camera
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
55
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography highlights
17
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
17
focal length is fixed (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Travel photography camera
52
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
63
flash built-in
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Landscape photography camera
28
manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.5 inches)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
45
focusing manually
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
good sized screen (3 inches)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-Z35
Vlogging with Ricoh GR Digital III
22
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing mic port
25
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Brand Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Ricoh GR Digital III
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-02-21 2009-07-27
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 GR engine III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 64 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/1.9
Macro focusing distance 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 124 gr (0.27 lb) 208 gr (0.46 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-82 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $99 $399