Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR II
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26


89 Imaging
58 Features
55 Overall
56
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh GR

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR II, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and GR II (16MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.

The EX-Z35 was manufactured 6 years prior to the GR II and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the GR II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Ricoh GR II. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh GR II
EX-Z35 | GR II |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Casio EX-Z35
GR II | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2015 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 64 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR II
EX-Z35 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 offers exterior measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR II in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the GR II.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and GR II is 96 and 89 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and GR II.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z35 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Ricoh GR II will offer greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GR II |
Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2015-06-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 300 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 pounds) | 251 grams (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-82 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $99 | $599 |