Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR III
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
- Successor is Ricoh GR III
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh GR III, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and GR III (24MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z35 was revealed 9 years before the GR III and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-Z35 matches up versus the GR III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR III. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh GR III
EX-Z35 | GR III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Casio EX-Z35
GR III | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | February 2010 | Fresher by 104 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR III
EX-Z35 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 enjoys external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh GR III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z35 against the GR III.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and GR III is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The photograph here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and GR III.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z35 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh GR III will provide greater detail because of its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GR III |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2018-09-25 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 pounds) | 257 grams (0.57 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $99 | $900 |